Wednesday, January 02. 2008Happy New YearPrinter FriendlyTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Even though I would never prefer MySQL over Postgres, I don't think features like these are withholding a lot of users from switching. Being able to scale postgres over more then 1 server is critical. Right now as a user we need to fall back to solutions as drbd or ill-featured, based on old versions, replication solutions.
For all it's weaknesses, MySQL does have working replication (at least I guess it's master/slave replication is usable).
I haven't used MySQL at all and I haven't yet used Slony as PostgreSQL's replication solution.
I am curious about the ways that Slony falls short as a Primary-Secondary replication solution when compared with MySQL's replication solution? |
Entry's LinksQuicksearchCalendar
Categories
Blog Administration |